'Paperman' Review/ Disney's future

A cute insight into the future...



It's amazing to see in the past decade just how one company can change from being something that was ending up to be forgotten, to rise up and make amazing content again. Of course the company that I am of course talking about is Disney. A company which well let's be honest, boomed in the 90's era creating diverse and entertaining hand-drawn animation, and then faltered in their own demise in the early/ mid 2000's due to Pixar's separation and success and lack of creativity when it came down to other projects such as the 'Pirates of the Caribbean' sequels and others which fell down the pipe. However despite this, looking at Disney today, specifically the Walt Disney Animation studio, I can honestly say that Disney are once again making great content for all ages which for me brings up a bold statement.. are we once again witnessing a Disney 'New Wave' when it comes to their animated content?

So obviously one of the main topics of this specific post will be about Disney Animation of today and the near future and maybe perhaps some other titles that have caught my attention that Disney are producing, but before we delve into that in great depth, I think it's important that we firstly talk about the animated short 'Paperman' which funnily enough can be argued that this piece of work which is masterfully done by the way, IS the catalyst of all the great works we have seen in the past recent years and future projects which I'm sure will be as entertaining and as magical as the great Disney works of the 90's. The reasoning behind saying 'Paperman' is the catalyst behind all these sweet looking animations we have seen by Disney lately, is simply due to it's detail and design. If you look closely and hard at this short and compare the design with the likes of 'Tangled' or 'Frozen', there is a definite comparison between them all when it comes to specifically the character design and how it is essentially a hand drawn piece. Don't get me wrong, I won't hesitate in saying that at least 30-40% of the pieces are made of C.G.I, but at the core of it all with some of the locations and especially the characters (more noticeable around the eyes I would say) are hand-drawn which for me makes me smile. Typically as a film-goer, whenever a new animation is coming out whether it's done by Pixar or Dreamworks, it's usually the norm of today to go about producing animations fully from the computer, Yes, on the odd occasion we do get once in a while a feature that is fully drawn such as what Studio Ghibli did do very well from the early 2000's up to now, but the fact still remains that the norm for most animators would be to implement the usage of C.G.I. Not that I have any real negativity towards the whole idea of C.G.I and how film-makers use it, sometimes the integration of it can be very appealing and can make any film be worth watching, but it is a technology that has divided a lot of cinema-goers and critics. For me, I'm sought of on the fence about it all. More than anything, I would like to see a consistent trend of works which do rely on the artists hands rather than turn to a computer, yet at the same time I wouldn't mind if the C.G.I added another artistic demention to these western works. A good example of where this has worked in Japanese animation is of course Ghibli when they were creating 'Ponyo' and although the majority of the film is hand-drawn which was a big statement to make back in 2010, it did use only a little bit of C.G.I when it came down to the under-water segments but did look natural along side the drawn animation. However, more than anything, whenever someone or some film company has decided to release a drawn piece of work, I'm always interested in watching it. Another reason for me liking the drawn animation over the computer is due to the fact that I was brought up in the 90's which brought about Disney's greatest moment in the animations they produced. It's fair to say as well that I was always someone that watched cartoons/animation a lot when I was little. For instance non-stop I would always watch things like 'Pokemon' or the 'Batman Animated Series' and just get engrossed in it all really.

Enough of me raving on about C.G.I Vs. Drawn pieces of work and mentioning the reasons why I favour hand-drawn, Let's talk more about 'Paperman'. So like I said previous, it is primarally all drawn which is again a statement of intent and look into the future of Disney animation of what they would eventually do. I like the fact that it's all set in black and white as well since it does contrast really well with the cute love story that we have at our viewing pleasure. At the end of it the short, I did very much like the story of the guy and girl bumping into each other, splitting a part for while, and then at the end seeing each other again as though they were meant to meet.
Although I was pleased with how it was all paced, I wished this was an actual 90 minute feature which would of been a great watched in my opinion but I guess maybe it doesn't appeal to Disney's main target audience, which is of course young kids. I also liked the fact that there wasn't any dialogue whatsoever apart from a little chuckle from the girl character. Like with the monochrome outlook, the sound also contributed to the 'look' of the short since they didn't add much character sound; the fact that they only added in ambient sounds such as like cars noises from the road or paper waving about in the office that the guy was working really did add to the verisimilitude of the short. Overall with 'Paperman' even though it is a short and it really shouldn't be taken seriously, it is an important piece of work which can be argued in saying that it did set up films such as 'Tangled' and 'Frozen' in terms of the drawn detail. I would put it up their with 'Destino' as one of my favourite animated shorts which I would watch on occasion.


Disney's Magical 3




Now at the start of this blog, I did say not only will I be sought of doing a review of 'Paperman', but also I would be talking about Disney's recent successes and also where Disney as a whole will be in terms of the content that they will be bringing out. So the sensible thing I think to talk about are the films that have been released in recent years ('Tangled', 'Wreck It Ralph', and 'Frozen') and basically just give you my feelings on each of them and why they are so engaging and fun to watch. So the first of the 3 films that came out way back in 2010 which I'll talk about first will be indeed 'Tangled'. This was probably the origin of where Disney's recent successes started with applying what they did with 'Paperman', and fused it with a 90 minute feature in 'Tangled' which not only brings crisp character design, but the emphasis on all the other aspects such as 'light' (which is a common theme in this film), dialogue and familiarity really blossom through in this. I remember the first time watching the trailer for 'Tangled' and I was thinking to my-self that this film could really be a hit or miss for Disney in that they could really improve and go back to the way they used to entertain everyone around the world, or they could of easily fell down the rabbit whole and never come back up. Gladly when I finally got around to watching it, those worries of it being a miss quickly faded away. For me at least in terms of how it's layed out with the characters and the setting, 'Tangled very much gave me this 'Shrek' vibe. The reasoning behind this is simply because 'Shrek' as a whole is a film that does take joy in mocking old fashioned fairy tales and pretty much get's away with it which is why the 'Shrek' series is so appreciated. With 'Tangled' I kind of have the same vibe in the sense that the characters in how they approach the story are very modern. For example there's an instance when Flynn Rider first interacts with Rapunzel and how he starts off by saying 'I know not who you are, nor how I came to find you, but may I just say..' and then finishes off with this flirtatious yet ambitious way of saying 'hi'. it's the clever use of dialogue that really appeals to a lot of different age groups which 'Shrek' did also. The other aspect I liked about 'Tangled' was the music and the right choices of songs to play at the right time. At moments I thought I was watching a musical or something along the lines anyway. I think credit must go to Mandy Moore (who played Rapunzel) for the music performances in this film. I think it was a smart move by Disney to get someone to play this up-beat character who can also sing really well. Speaking of characters, in my opinion, I think it's properly the first time from Disney that we had seen a likeable funny male figure in Flynn. He is basically the 'Shrek' of this film in that he brings the majority of comedy to the whole film and plays off with other characters in this film especially with  the horse Maximus as they really come across as the 'Shrek and Donkey' partnership in this film. Overall 'Tangled' really did bring back that classic Disney way of expressing their magic. The songs, characters and design do have this air of familiarity about them which is certainly not a bad thing, in fact it's refreshing to see a formula if you might say that, that so many of us were used to back in the 90's.